Nov 14 2008
As the field of Corporate Health Promotion Programs continues to evolve, the need to define and articulate the components of this comprehensive approach increases. In 1987 Allensworth and Kolbe (1987) expanded the prevailing definition of comprehensive school health to include the domains of Health Instruction, Healthy Environment, Health Services, Physical Education, Counseling and Psychological Services, School Food Service, Corporate Health Promotion Programs for Faculty and Staff, and the Integration of School and Community Resources.
To promote the health of school children, prevention specialists have found that an integrated comprehensive approach is the most effective strategy. Relying only on health education or Physical Education programs to foster children’s health has demonstrated limited effectiveness. Consistent health messages delivered by numerous agents increases the possibility of attaining health goals and objectives. A similar model is essential if Corporate Health Promotion Programs are to impact positively on the health and performance of all employees.
A comprehensive model of Corporate Health Promotion Programs includes the following components; Health Education Programs, worker Health Services and Benefits, physical fitness and nutrition Programs, Corporate Health Promotion Program Policies and Procedures, Counseling and Employee Assistance Programs, a Safe and Healthy Work Environment, and the Integration of Company and Community Resources. This model can be used to evaluate and plan for Corporate Health Promotion Programs that are truly comprehensive in nature, focusing on primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies for employees.
One value of a truly comprehensive model is that it is possible to promote a holistic approach of worker health. A healthy, productive worker is one who is given the opportunity to develop emotionally, physically, socially, intellectually and spiritually. In addition, this model supports the ideals of wellness and optimal health by encouraging worksites to go beyond programs designed to only reduce healthcare costs, prevent disease, or maintain health.
A key factor in the utility of this model is the integration and overlap of responsibilities. Design and implementation are dependent upon the motivation and cooperation of qualified – and ideally – credentialed consultants throughout the administrative structure of a corporation. Such a model requires consistent communication between health educators, medical staff, human resource managers, physical therapists, industrial hygienists, physical fitness physiologists, ergonomic engineers, dietitians, occupational therapists, psychologists and independent consultants. Planning must also incorporate active involvement of workers, administrators, family members, and corporation retirees at all stages of the development, implementation and evaluation stages. All must be committed to the development of a healthy organization where employees are happy and proud to work.
Various professional groups are working to advance the science of Corporate Health Promotion Programs. Health educators have the training and expertise to be leaders in this area. On the basis of theoretical foundations of behavior and the results of empirical research, we must begin to articulate a clear vision of what optimal programs should consist of. Components of this model are included below for reference and will be discussed individually in coming posts.
• Health Education
• physical fitness and nutrition Programs
• worker Health Services and worker Benefits
• Counseling & Employee Assistance Programs
• Health and Safe Work Environment
• Health Related corporation Policies and Procedures
• Integration of corporation and Community Resources